By now, we’ve all heard about the horrific Planned Parenthood shootings in Colorado. We all know who was behind this and we have a fair idea of his motives. We have a pretty decent idea that this was not a nice man, that he was abusive.
Well, everyone except the New York Times. According to the times, Dear was a “gentle loner”.
Oh yes, a “gentle loner” who had a domestic violence charge leveled at him. A “gentle loner” who abused his dogs. A “gentle loner” who scared his neighbors so badly that they didn’t want to speak to anyone in regards to this man. This is an obviously violent man with very violent tendencies, yet he’s called a “gentle loner” by a well known media outlet.
What the hell is wrong here? How is it that a man who opened fire on innocent people at a Planned Parenthood clinic, who was known as being abusive is seen as “gentle”? There was nothing gentle about him at all, yet he gets a big fat pass by the media.
This is your liberal media. It doesn’t look so damned “liberal” now, does it?